January 11th, 2010, 03:10 PM   1
Steve Price
Administrator

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 45
Were ensis door rugs before the late 19th century?

Hi People

There are some who believe that the use of the ensi as a door rug didn't begin until the late 19th century. Here, for example, is a recent statement from someone who represents himself to be an authority on Turkmen weavings:

... it might be true for Turkmen engsi made after the Russian conquest in the late 1880’s but it is surely not a fact for any made before.

Abbott's Narrative of a Journey from Heraut to Khiva, published in 1839, includes the following. My source is MacDonald's Tribal Rugs: Treasures of the Black Tent (p. 18):

The best woven girths, like other fine woven artifacts, are not used throughout the year as they are likely to get spoiled by smoke in winter and mutton fat. The Engsi (door rug) was hung on the outside of the door frame so as not to conflict with the inward opening door-leaves, and with the pile facing outwards.

Obviously, the ensi was a pile weaving used as a door rug at least as early as the 1830's. Abbott's comment about the best weavings not being used in the winter because of the effect smoke from the tent fire would have on them is interesting, too. His words imply that fine weavings weren't necessarily reserved for special occasions, only that they weren't used during the winter. It isn't clear whether this applied to ensis: having the pile facing outwards and inward opening door leaves behind it would protect the ensi from the smoke in the tent.

Regards

Steve Price
January 14th, 2010, 09:46 AM   2
Pierre Galafassi
Members

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3

Hi Steve,
E. O’Donovan, a British traveler with an analytical eye, (not only for the strategic- and commercial issues which were of interest to the Foreign Office), spent 3 years (1879-1881) south east of the Caspian, living for example 4 months in Gumush Tepe, a Yomud village of felt yurts, south of the Atterek river on the Persian border. In his book «Merv Oasis Travels. Tome I», he mentions pile carpets used as door hanging «which hang curtain-wise» (page 225). Although O’Donovan was no ruggie, he knew perfectly well the difference between pile rugs and felt, (he gives a very interesting detail description of the production of the latter, (page 173-174) and mentions repeatedly the pile rug weaving performed by his hostess and her daughters). A confusion between felt-and pile hangings is very unlikely.

The hypothesis of an influence of the Russians on door-hangings production seems indeed rather adventurous, at least in the area in question:
Although the Russian armies raided the southern Caspian area several time before 1879, even as deep into Persia as Asterabad, their military presence just north of Gumush Tepe dated only 1879, since they initially planned to start their offensive against the Tekes from the mouth of the Atterek river. In 1879 even the fall of Khiva (700 km north-east, with the Garakum in between!!) was only six years old.
The theory about a commercial influence of armenian- or russian merchants on carpet production and introduction of ensis, is also weakened by O’Donovan’s remark (page 245: «The carpets which they make are retained for their own use; the slow rate at which they are produced, and the high price which would necessarily be asked for them, would effectually extinguish any attempt at commerce of such articles»). He also notes that the Yomud sold food (dry salted fish) and horse fodder to the Russians, but bought everything they needed from Asterabad.
Another detail indirectly interesting for a ruggie: He notes that while the Persians used tinned copper pots, such expensive material was exceedingly seldom, in this area, in Turkoman villages (mainly Yomud and Göklan), who used only iron pots. It is likely therefore that they used iron pots for dyeing too, which more likely than not, often dulled and «blued» their madder shades. O’ Donovan also mentions that the main rivers in this area, the muddy Atterek and Giurgien, were carrying much salt and clay (thus probably some iron too, included in the clay).

Since the rules of Turkotek do not explicitly ban harebrained theories, I feel free to suppose that the brightest turkoman red shades came from clans rich enough to afford tinned copper pots, reasonably pure alum and living near rivers uncontaminated by iron.
Finally, a note which confirms Abbott’s: O‘Donovan indicates that when it rains (thus, in winter), the hole in the center of the yurt dome is closed and the only issue left for the smoke is the (then open) door.
Regards
Pierre
January 14th, 2010, 10:16 AM  3
Steve Price
Administrator

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 45

Hi Pierre

That's interesting stuff, especially the notion that the red colors were affected by whether the dyeing was done in copper or in iron pots and the link that this had to the affluence of the local community. I haven't seen those dots connected before.

The idea that the use of ensis as door rugs didn't start until the late 1880's comes from a self-proclaimed Turkmen "expert" who, just a few years ago, was insisting that Turkmen didn't have camels or the technology to attach cloth trappings to animals: that is, that they didn't have rope or braided cord, and/or that they didn't know how to use those things.

You're right, we don't proscribe harebrained theories. There would hardly be anything rug-related to talk about if we did!

Regards

Steve Price