Azarbaijan "Suzanis"
Dear folks -
This is the last set of three textiles I have planned to offer for comparision
and rating in this salon.
These pieces are suzanis attributed to Azarbaijan. They are described as "silk
embroidery." All three of an approximate size, about 2'X2' or 3'X3' and are
said to be of the "masnad' variety, a textile on which important people would
sit. All three are estimated to have been made in the 18th century; one might
have been woven in the 17th century.
Here they are first side by side:
Here they are sequentially with closer details interspersed.
Suzani A
Suzani B
Suzani C
Please examine these three pieces comparatively and give your ratings and reasoning.
You know the drill.
Regards,
R. John Howe
I thought I disliked Susanis as much as any textiles I've ever seen until I saw these awful gut wrenching eyesores. Sue
Dear folks -
Again, let me state what is obvious: that I have no particular knowledge of
the group of textiles from which these three embroidered pieces come.
But I do have aesthetic responses to them.
Suzani A: Best: 8
Rationale: I think the planning of the composition of this piece is evident
and the person who made it brought it off successfully. The graphic impact is
strong and the colors seem both the most definite and most successful of the
three. The drawing is controlled and crisp, some might say a little mechanical.
I think the framing effect of the border would be better if its scale were a
little smaller.
Suzani B: Better: 6
Rationale: It may be unfair to say that a textile that may be 17th century has
pale colors, but the colors of this piece are the least definite of the three.
On the other hand, the mildness that they project is consistent among them and
their harmony is to be admired. Both the dark ground and the mild orange? work
effectively to enliven this embroidery. This piece is well and precisely composed
on its medallion center and the drawing is good if sometimes abstracted throughout.
Suzani C: Best: 7
Rationale: For me it is a fairly close call between this piece and A. I think
I rate this piece slightly lower mostly because of the asymmetrical presentation
of the never-ending design of its field (others might defensibly see this as
an interest-creating virtue; certainly the fluid drawing in this piece escapes
the possible mechanical character that might be seen by some in A). I think
I would rate it higher if the maker had successfully included three full cartouches
on the horizontal. The colors are mild but definite (a rather effective combination
of red and yellow that does not jar at all). The drawing of the armature-like
lattice that creates the cartouches seems vague in places, partly because of
color choice (I think things might have been better of the use of brown in the
lower right cartouche had been continued throughout) and partly because of intricacies
of the interior designs. In any event, the cartouches don't frame as emphatically
as I would like. I do have to admit that the detailed, delicate drawing seems
very skillful, perhaps the most successful of the three. The green-ground border
is mild in color, but still has a framing effect without drawing undue attention
to itself.
Regards,
R. John Howe
"Anoymous Expert" Comments
Dear folks -
The person I asked to serve as my anonymous expert has responded, resisting
a bit that precise role, but has allowed me to quote some comments.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous Expert:
"Rating is so subjective, espec from diggies. I've
never seen the pieces. I don't think it's common
to call Azerbaijani embroideries "suzanis". Most are simply cross stitch or
stem stitch silk embroideries. (ed. the "suzani" usage is Tanavoli's, but he
also uses "embroideries")
"The first one, w/the humanoids is most appealing,
at least to me; the roundel is second; I can guess
the color has faded; the last, which looks like it's
related to so-called "Symerna" carpets, looks
least appealing.
"Numbers rating isn't worth much, I...think.
"Second email: ...the first piece has been
published multiple times and has Safavid court design
origins."
-------------------------------------------------------------
My thanks to my anonymous expert for this comment.
Regards,
R. John Howe