You want color?
Dear T'Tekers,
All this talk about color has stimulated my competitive
urges.
So I submit for your consideration (in the parlance of Academy
Award campaigns) the following two pieces I've recently acquired.
The
first is a Shahsavan pile bagface (24" x 24"). These are pretty uncommon. My
piece is a much less refined version of a bag that Wendel Swan owns one half of
and Joe Fell the other. (If Wendel or Joe wants to post a picture of their piece
for comparison, please do so.) But it shares a similar design and vivacious use
of color.
The second is a Jaf Kurd (33" x 25"). It's colorful even by the
standards of Jaf Kurd bags.
As best I can tell the colors are all old, without synthetics.
At the risk of allowing me to say these are beautiful because I like
them, perhaps one or another of you would like to hold them up to the standards
John has highlighted.
And since I don't get up early enough to get the
good stuff at flea markets, these were both bought on that famous internet flea
market, eBay in the last couple months.
Cordially,
-Jerry-
Hi Jerry,
Beautiful pieces and lovely colors, no doubt about
it.
Photos are a bit dark – on my monitor(s), that
is.
Regards,
Filiberto
They appear "a bit dark" because the lightest color on the Shahsavan piece
isn't white: it's ivory. The Kurd has a pure white. The rest of the colors are
very saturated.
I ran them through Photoshop to tone-down the brightness
the flash imparted. Photoshop, in the hands of someone not trying to "punch-up"
colors to create a false sense of vividness, can be very helpful in restoring
actual levels of brightness and contrast. (Not that I'd ever suggest that there
are dealers out there who'd "tinker", shall we say, with the color rendition to
make their otherwise dowdy pieces sizzle.)
What I see here is just about
right.
Cordially,
-Jerry-
Hi Jerry,
Here are two pieces with similar designs from my collection.
The tiny sumak double bag is probably Shahsevan with their typical cruciform
grid. Interestingly the whites are woven with cotton and are not ivory colored
as in your "Shahsevan" pile panel. The white in my Jaff though is ivory colored
wool.
The rhomboid white border design appears in my Kurd Jaff and in
your pile "Shahsevan" panel. The Jaff Kurds spend there winter in Iraq and there
summers in the mountainous area close to Saqqez in Western Azarbaijan of Iran;
not too far from encampments of Shahsevans. Could it be that your cruciform PILE
panel is actually Kurdish? I'm not so sure myself; 99% of the old Shahsevan bags
are sumaks. The multicolored fastening top portion with the slits is
Shahsevanish !!?
By the way, It seems that the Jaff piece has at least
one of it's borders missing.
Having said all that, I find the color blend
of both panels extremely
attractive; thank you very much for showing them to
us.
Amir Aharon
Hi Jerry
Re; your Shahsavan bagface - you can count yourself very
lucky to be the owner !!
I salivated over that piece for 6 days and 58
minutes before deciding not to buy it ;-)
I sat comparing / contrasting
it to images of Wendel's piece. I wanted it to be the same but no matter how
much I tried I couldn't convert it !! ( I see you recognise that too) - but then
again Wendel's piece is what I regard as the ULTIMATE in Shahsavan pieces. I
hope one day to see it in the flesh.
Your piece is still a very fine
specimen.
Amir - should you ever get bored with your tiny shahsavan
bagset, i would love to discuss a retirement plan for its
existence.
regards
richard tomlinson
Hi Richard,
The tiny Shahsevan is so fragile and in fact she is only
seventeen (inches!!), so she has these two bigger (not older) brothers watching
her. Seen in the image are Afshar Khan Khorjin to her right and Turkmen Khan to
the left. To get close to her you have to catch them off guard.
As to her
retirement plan, she is genuinely flattered by your interest. Sometimes, "All
you need is love" and a lot of patience. Who knows, she may want to elope with
you one of these days. The other two, are only half-brothers anyway. You can see
that they are a different breed altogether.
Good Luck!,
Amir
Aharon
Hi Jerry
Cangratulations on your purchase, I think? I bid on this one
myself.
What got me going, besides everything else, was use of white this
border. Really nice!
Dave
Exactly, David.
I have a theory that I'm just about ready to proclaim
as an axiom, and that is: a rug's attractiveness is directly related to the
amount of white used.
I first noticed this when I participated in a "Good
Rug. Great Rug." panel. The idea of this exercise is to judge which of two very
similar rugs are "better". The audience also participates. In every instance
where one of the rugs had a white border it was
preferred.
Why?
Perhaps it has something to do with colors
appearing more vivid surrounded by or on a ground of white. Maybe the white
serves to attract (or focus) one's attention more. In truth, I can't tell you
why. But I've since participated in several more "Good Rug. Great Rug." panels
with the same results every time. I know this doesn't qualify as any thing more
than anecdotal evidence - but it sure feels right.
Cordially,
-Jerry-
use of white
jerry, david
i too like pieces with white (actually i dont like cotton
white, but prefer ivory white wool)
i find the use of this colour
extremely important in the overall balance of rugs, and think it is vastly
underestimated.
here is a piece that i think is ugly - it has white
cotton borders but the white is almost overpowering. it is blinding.
but
that is just a subjective opinion.
richard tomlinson
Hi all,
I agree with the observation/hypothesis about the importance
of white in bringing a rug's colours to life. I also find this especially
effective in the border. Here is a small rug (Khamseh?) that would not have
attracted me nearly as much without that white inner border. I find that it
accentuates the field colours nicely. Now if I could only do something about
that stray pink/orange hexagon....
Cheers,
James
Don’t worry James,
Just call it pink/apricot.
Nice bags over here!
Regards,
Filiberto