Posted by Steve Price on 07-24-2003 09:01 AM:
Closing Remarks
Hi People
I introduced this topic in the hope that we might, through
our collective experiences and thinking, be able to shed a little light on some
of the puzzles surrounding the Turkmen pile decorated tentbands. They are widely
believed to be the Turkmen weavings most closely related to archaic Turkmen
products, but it is very difficult to make specific tribal attributions of most
of them. And, with only one known exception, all are woven with single wefts
between rows of knots, using symmetric knots tied around alternate warps. The
one exception is an all-pile tentband, not a pile decorated piece, knotted
asymmetrically. Two other published examples are described as being
asymmetrically knotted, but the owners assure us that this is not the case -
both are symmetrically knotted.
We made no significant progress in
developing ideas about tribal attribution.
On the second major issue,
though, Vincent Keers generated a rational explanation for the nearly universal
use of symmetric knotting on alternate warps. Working with a home made loom,
Vincent discovered that the use of single wefting makes the fabric extremely
flexible, and that symmetric knotting over alternate warps gives it a level of
stability and an evenness in final appearance that cannot be achieved with
asymmetric knotting on alternate warps or by knotting in the conventional manner
in which knots are wrapped around consecutive warps. That is, the mystery of
the very unusual structure of the pile-decorated tentbands now has a plausible
explanation, thanks to Vincent's investigations. I have highlighted this
because I think it is a significant contribution to our understanding, and such
contributions are relatively rare and deserve special attention.
Other
discussion topics included reference to some other sources of on-line
information about Turkmen tentbands as well as to some resources in print. We
also noted the occasional presence of "out of context" design elements in some
tentbands: tauk noska type animals and motifs that appear to be related
to aina guls.
Richard Farber submitted a fragment of a long (his
fragment is about 4 feet long; another related specimen is about 10 feet long),
narrow (about 3 inches) textile embroidered on both sides with silk on a
canvas-like cotton ground. We puzzled over its origin and use for awhile. Tom
Cole was able to place it within the Turkmen group, but not more specific than
that. It's use is still unknown.
I want to thank everyone who
participated in the discussion.
Regards,
Steve Price