Flatwoven Bagface
Hi Patrick
Thanks for a fantastic salon with loads of useful and
informative information.
Here's a little flatweave bagface that I believe
is Luri. The main field is camel hair I think. The handle is thick and stiff.
The dyes are natural but weak and fairly subdued. The one end is braided and
folded over. The field design is simple and intriguing. Whenever I look at this
bag, I think "Crop circles, UFOs !!"
I believe from what I have read in
your salon, this piece features several typical Luri features (except the warps
are white wool.)
Is it Luri? What are the
motifs?
Thanks
Richard Tomlinson
Intriguing Example
Richard,
The bag that I show in the salon is 10 1/2" wide x 17" long,
not including the tassles. 27cm x 45cm.
It has a cotton warp and weft except
for two inches of the warp on the back is goat hair. Lurs and Bakhtiyari used
cotton in their flatweaves, usually for white highlights and for the background
in the designs on their large khorjin.
You bag looks similar in size, but
with wool foundation and a bit wider and shorter. They may have had similar
functions.
I cannot tell from your photo if your bag was made in one long
piece and sewn up the sides, or, like mine, made in one wide piece and folded
over and sewn up one side. The herringbone outer borders on your piece look
similar to those on my bag.
The main design on your piece seems similar to
many sofreh from the Afshar/Baluch SE Iran area. The weft float borders on your
bag also are familiar from this area.
There has not been a lot of study of
bags of this type, so references are limited. A photo of the back, with
measurements, may enlighten us more.
Patrick Weiler
Why are you fellows calling this a bagface? There does not seem to be any
closures visible in the photo. This mat is finished like a rug in typical Luri
fashion, with a kilim and braid at the top and plain kilim and knotted fringe at
the bottom.
John Collins
Size Does Matter
John,
You are quite right about the ends appearing to be woven just
like a regular small flatweave mat.
Since Richard prefaced his remarks with
the statement "little flatweave bagface", I approached the weaving from that
perspective.
It is interesting that relative size is difficult to determine
from a photo with nothing to help us see the relative size.
The wear at each
side of the weaving, with relatively less wear in the middle, is unusual. I am
curious about the process that would have resulted in this type of wear.
Again, the size would help. I believe that small flatweaves were used as
flour sofreh and clothing carriers.
Patrick Weiler
Hi
I assumed it was a bagface from the size ( 18 x 13 inches - 46cm X
33cm excluding fringes )
Yes - it looks like a sofreh but considerably
smaller.
Patrick, I will try to get some pictures up of the sides and
back later.
Thanks for the comments.
Richard Tomlinson
Odd Size
Richard,
Yes, that is an odd size. Most of the flour sofreh are about
double that size, and usually rather square. It is certainly too small for a
rug. As a mat, it may have had a heretofore unknown use. A bread
cover?
Patrick Weiler
Mysterious motifs
Richard,
You asked "What are the motifs?" on your weaving.
The
motif of a central diamond with upper and lower pendants and either attached (by
arms) or detached side pendants is not uncommon in tribal weavings. It may have
been borrowed from more formal medallion-and-pendant rugs.
Several sofreh in
the book Bread and Salt by Tanavoli show this design.
Speculation about the
meaning of this design runs from the apotropaic "evil eye" deflector to the sun,
a supernova or fire representations.
Points East, West, North and South have
been suggested, as has the abstract scorpion motif, again supposed to be used to
deflect against evil influences.
A most likely explanation is that the
weavers felt compelled to add some color, identifying characteristics or
interest to their weavings, borrowing from sources such as commonly used
traditional motifs to the more adventurous.
I will post a photo of the back
of my spindle/ladle bag showing some of the scattered
decorations.
Patrick Weiler
Hi Patrick
Thanks for the comments. I will get Steve to add some
additional images of the sides and back.
It appears that the camel hair
(if that is what it is) has worn more quickly than the wool, especially with
regard to the selvages.
A strange little
'mat'.
Regards
Richard
Note: here are the images Richard
sent me. Steve Price
Back Up
Richard,
These photos show the back of the ladle bag. You can see the
2" of goat hair warp threads along one side. Why did they do this when the rest
of the foundation is cotton?
The close up shows a couple of the indiscriminately placed
cross motifs that are scattered about. There is no rhyme or reason for including
these extra-weft designs, unless they are to ward off the evil eye.
Although
these two look a bit like the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, where God is
touching Adam by the fingertips.....
Patrick Weiler
Kurds of Fars?
Hi Richard and Patrick,
Looking at the braided oblique end finishes at
one end of this piece, I was wondering if it may be Kurdish. Isn't that a
typical end finish style of typical Kurdish weavings?
Best
wishes
Danny
Not exclusively
Danny,
You are right that oblique interlacing is a characteristic
common to many Kurdish weavings, but it is not exclusively used by them. In the
chapter on End Finishes from Marla Mallet's book Woven Structures, she shows a
Bakhtiyari kilim, in addition to several Anatolian weavings with this
feature.
On Marla's web site, there is a section devoted to end finishes,
http://www.marlamallett.com/end.htm
Several different
types of rugs show this feature, including Caucasian, Kurdish, Anatolian, NW
Persian etc.
This end finish makes a durable guard for the end of the
weaving.
Patrick Weiler