Subject | : | Offset verticals? |
Author | : | Christoph Huber mailto:%20huber-ch@pilatusnet.ch |
Date | : | 10-03-2001 on 05:45 p.m. |
Dear all
As can be seen on some of the other threads, one of the main issues
discussing offset knotting is the necessity of transitions to vertical
design elements.
The ornamentation of the field has no verticals and would be perfectly fitted for offset knotting and one could even ask whether we are facing a weaving copying an offset knotted model. I think this would be quite remarkable since Beshir and Ersari carpets aren't famous for using offset knotting... Best regards, |
Subject | : | Re:Offset verticals? |
Author | : | R. John Howe mailto:%20rjhowe@erols.com |
Date | : | 10-04-2001 on 06:33 a.m. |
Christoph -
Another thing I'm noticing about this regularly knotted example is that while the diagonals seem smooth, the straight vertical columns and the "ram's horn" devices seem a little ragged. Is that not just the opposite of what one would expect (at least with the vertical design components) with regular knotting? And why do the "ram's horn" devices (that include some brief moves to the diagonal) also look ragged throughout? Regards, R. John Howe |
Subject | : | Re:Offset verticals? |
Author | : | Christoph Huber mailto:%20huber-ch@pilatusnet.ch |
Date | : | 10-04-2001 on 01:34 p.m. |
Dear John
With „while the diagonals seem smooth, the straight vertical columns
[...] seem a little ragged“ you described the effect overall offset
knotting would produce. Since on this regular knotted rug the raggedness
of the “stem” isn’t structure determined it can be applied wherever the
weaver wants to do so. But you’re right, the horizontal and diagonal parts
of the “ram’s horns” wouldn’t be ragged for structural reasons if offset
knotted. Regards, |