TurkoTek Discussion Boards

Subject  :  Concluding Remarks
Author  :  Steve Price mailto:%20sprice@hsc.vcu.edu
Date  :  08-10-2001 on 02:48 p.m.
I like to present stuff about which relatively little is known. Our readership includes a rather wide range of expertises and backgrounds, and often they can collectively bring in considerations that significantly expand our understanding. That happened, for instance, in our discussion on "simurgh and dragon" Kaitag embroideries.

We had less success with the "four-lobed medallion" Kaitag group, although it does appear that the design has its roots in the Persian rather than the Turkish vocabulary. Richard Farber presented an interesting likely precursor to the design group, too, one that brings in the importance of the flame as a protective device. We also have some reasons to believe that certain specimens of this group were dowry wrappers while others - probably the majority - were used to protect infants from the evil eye.

This, I think, is how we learn: people toss in their ideas and the bases for those ideas, and we follow the evidence and arguments wherever they lead us. I believe that this is kind of fun, and am convinced that it is useful.

Thanks to all who participated.

Steve Price

Powered by UltraBoard 2000 <http://www.ub2k.com/>