TurkoTek Discussion Boards

Subject  :  Velvet Cushion Covers (Yastiks) and Later Tribal Versions
Author  :  John Howe
Date  :  06-12-2000 on 07:55 a.m.
rjhowe@erols.com There was one velvet cushion cover in the Zimmmer-Seidman Rug Morning and there are two more in the Corcoran Topkapi exhibition (by the way it closes this coming Thursday, in case you haven't seen it). Here is the first of these two Topkapi pieces. Here is a close-up detail of this first piece. Here is the second Topkapi piece, this one with quite a bit more white. The exhibition catalog indicates that both of these pieces are from the 17th century. Notice again that these court velvets have a quite narrow range of color and draw on strong graphics for their aesthetic merit. The yastik format is one that is also encountered in later village wool pile weavings. Here are two from Brian Morehouse's book, Yastiks, 1996, that might be seen to retain echoes of these court velvets. The first one retains the border-less format of the court yastiks. Sometimes versions of yastiks acquire borders and become "little rugs," so to speak. And in fact larger rugs do occur that have lappets (the little shield-like devices at the ends). Regards, R. John Howe

Subject  :  RE:Velvet Cushion Covers (Yastiks) and Later Tribal Versions
Author  :  R. John Howe
Date  :  06-12-2000 on 08:51 a.m.
Dear folks - Actually, I'm reading the Morehouse text a bit myopically and not looking closely enough at the second the the two Topkapi exhibition velvets above, since it already exhibits clear borders. So the tendency to emulate "rugs" was there even in these 17th century court velvets. Regards, R. John Howe

Subject  :  RE:Velvet Cushion Covers (Yastiks) and Later Tribal Versions
Author  :  Deschuyteneer Daniel
Date  :  06-14-2000 on 05:57 a.m.
Dear R. John and you all, It would be more accurate to speak of chatma cushion cover (brocaded velvet) instead of velvet. As you have noticed it, one of the distinctive feature of these cushion covers are the “six” lappets appearing at each end. This old tradition survived into the 18th century. According to N. Gürsu (page 161-163), during the 17th century, the designs used in these cushion covers were similar to the designs employed in other chatma fabrics or, they were conformed to the shape of the cushion cover or, as in the two examples you show, resembled designs of book cover, with a central medallion and four corner decorations. The designs typical of the beginning of the 17th century which were composed of an infinitely repeating pattern of carnations, palmettes, round medallions and stellar flowers are totally absent from 18th century cushion cover. At the other hand, the arrangement of a symmetrical pattern in conformity with the shape of the fabric, typical of the 17th century, is still in evidence in the 18th century. After the end of the 17th century the lappets at each end begin to be separated from the main field by a border of stylized flowers. So knowing how the design evolved is of great help for dating these cushion covers. Thanks, Daniel

Subject  :  RE:Velvet Cushion Covers (Yastiks) and Later Tribal Versions
Author  :  R. John Howe
Date  :  06-14-2000 on 06:39 a.m.
Hi Daniel - Morehouse talks about variations in lappets as well. Some of the 17th century pile yastiks have seven lappets rather than six. Morehouse also draws attention to the internal instrumenting of lappets, noting how many "leaves" there at different times. The lappets in these two Topkapi examples seem to be detailed line drawings of flower forms with the central "blossom" exhibiting four projecting "petals" and two leaves underneath at the sides of the stem. This design was apparently simplified in later versions into four leaves, two on each side (Morehouse's early pile examples, dated to the 17th century, still show the blossom feature). Four-leaf lappet designs persist well into the 19th century but are conventionalized into two-leaf versions by the end of it. I'll add an unrelated thought here. Ed Zimmerman indicated in the TM presentation on which this salon focuses, that one question about which we could conjecture is whether it is possible to distinguish Ottoman textiles of this period that were made in Bursa from those made in Constantinople. The gallery label on one of the yastiks in the Corcoran Topkapi exhibition may provide a partial answer at least for these court yastiks. It suggests that the court factories in which these pieces were made were moved from Bursa to Constantinople in the 18th century. Regards, R. John Howe

Subject  :  RE:Velvet Cushion Covers (Yastiks) and Later Tribal Versions
Author  :  Wendel+Swan
Date  :  06-14-2000 on 07:53 a.m.
Dear John and all, In "A Wealth of Silk and Velvet," Christian Erber suggests that cushion covers were made in many areas, even mass-produced, thus accounting for the fact that there are so many examples of diverse patterns. He also has the impression that the cushion covers may have been a by product of fabric production. Erber refers to yastiks with the end patterns we call lappets as "Skutari covers," with Skutari being a makeshift collector's term for this class. The use of the term began when Europeans began to collect these covers with lobated borders in the 19th Century. Skutari derives from the Turkish Uskudar, a Constantinople suburb that, oddly enough, didn't take up velvet production until the 18th Century. Wendel

Subject  :  RE:Velvet Cushion Covers (Yastiks) and Later Tribal Versions
Author  :  R. John Howe
Date  :  06-15-2000 on 06:13 a.m.
Hi Wendel - Thanks for this further information on the terms "yastik" and "lappets." I have heard some hesitation on the part of some experienced collectors when the term "lappets" is used. But you can see why it might have been adopted. The clearly more accurately descriptive "lobated end borders" doesn't roll off the tongue with ease. Here is what Peter Stone gives us about "lappets" in his "The Oriental Rug Lexicon." "A common end design or elem design consisting of a row of five-sided figures or capped rectangles. The term "lappets" is derived from the folding ear flaps of a cap. The term is entirely Western." This is clearly what the hestitation is about. The Turks did not use this term at all. Regards, R. John Howe

Powered by UltraBoard 2000 <http://www.ub2k.com/>