Hi all,
Summarizing Dr. Dominique
Cardon’s «Natural Dyes», pages 263-289 and 686-687, and confirming Murray
Eiland’ s opinion mentioned by Richard:Logwood
(Haematoxylum campechianum L.),
sappanwood (Caesalpina sappan) and
brazilwood (Caesalpinia echinata) are all part of the same
botanical family, the leguminosae.
They contain mixes of chemically
similar but not identical homo-isoflavonoid dyes, which all are
mordant dyes and share a tendency for decent wet-fastness but very poor
light-fastness. The only exception seems to be the iron- or
copper-mordanted logwood dye-mix.
The main dyeing component in
logwood dyeing is intensely colored
haematein formed by
oxydation (by fermentation) of the natural substance in the heartwood of
logwood called haematoxylin, a much weaker dye.
Haematein, with some
help of tannin (another main component of logwood), mordanted with iron
salts or mixes of iron- and copper-salts, leads to strong black shades,
both as dyes (for wool, silk and cotton) and as pigments (for inks), which
all are very fast to light. Actually, they even often tend to darken
further with time and exposure to light. Hematein & tannin were the
base of the famed Victorian «jet-black» or «tuxedo black» for textiles and
of the «notary black» for inks.
Together with other mordants,
especially tin-, chromium- or aluminum salts,
logwood yields
various subdued- to-dull violet-, parma- and rose-shades, all invariably
of very poor lightfastness. As mentioned before, Logwood proper is native
of America and was much later known than sappanwood (native of Asia) and
brazilwood (native of Asia and America).
The main component in
both sappanwood- and brazilwood dyeing operations is the strongly
colored
brazilein, obtained again by oxydation of the natural
substance brazilin, a rather weak red dye.
When mordanted with alum or
tin, brazilein (mixed with various similar minor dyes whose chemical
structure was only recently elucidated), supply beautiful reds, in part
brighter and more fiery than rubia reds, but very fugitive to light.
Sappanwood was traded internationally from the Middle Ages onward,
later followed by brazilwood from Indonesia. Despite attempts by various
authorities to stop their use due to their fugitiveness, they kept being
used for centuries for all kind of red shades, mostly in mixture with
light-faster but less attractive reds. Cheating is no recent
invention.
Richard Tomlinson’s’ question about the type of light
fading of brazilein might be answered by a twelfth century Hispano moorish
silk (ibid. page 282), dyed with brazilein and a trifle (European- or
Asian-) cochineal, which shows a pinkish beige background. One could
therefore assume that brazilein turns beige when exposed to light
(cochineal is quite lightfast on silk, and probably responsible for the
pinkish part of the grey).
Owing to the facts that
1) «logwood»
was often used as a generic term for dye-providing wood and not always
specifically for haematoxylum campechianum,
2) Proper logwood was a
very late arrival on the market, while sappanwood and brazilwood were in
use since at least the tenth century in Asia and Europa,
3) Logwood
supplied, next to black, only subdued and rather bluish shades, while
sappanood and brazilwood gave also strong and bright reds.
4)
sappanwood is documented as being the source of «korozen» a fiery red for
silk in tenth century Japan,
one can suppose, Richard and Marvin, that
if your Chinese rugs were dyed with this family of dyes, it was rather
with sappanwood or brazilwood than with logwood.
Best regards
Pierre