Posted by Filiberto Boncompagni on 02-27-2005 11:13 AM:
Orientalist paintings - a follow-up
Dear all,
Around a year ago I presented a Salon on Rugs in Orientalist
paintings
http://turkotek.com/salon_00105/salon.html
One of the
objectives of discussion was in trying to ascertain the degree truthfulness of
those paintings: were they really drawn “on the spot”, were they reconstructed
in the artists’ studios based on sketches or photos from “Oriental” real life,
or were they a pure product of fantasy?
One of the artists presented was
Giulio Rosati
Giulio Rosati (1858-1917): He studied at San Luca’s
academy in Rome in the mid 70s.
Rosati was a prolific painter, well known for
his very detailed watercolors.
He used photography as his main source of
inspiration together with the accessories he accumulated in his Rome
atelier.
Three days ago I received this e-mail:
Dear Mr.
Boncompagni, I came across your site concerning oriental rugs in art works
because of a search on the Italian artist Giulio Rosati. In 1965 I purchased
about 800 stereo glass negatives which were travel photos taken by a wealthy
Mexican (I believe he was from there though not certain). For a number of years
beginning about 1909 up to the First World War this family traveled through most
of Europe, Eastern Europe and North Africa.
To get to my point, when in Rome
the photographer of the family visited three artists' studios and made
photographs of the artist with some of their works. There are four negatives of
Rosati in his studio, or works therein. I thought you might have an interest in
seeing them since you did a modest amount of research on this artist.
Of
course they are in black and white but still might be of some interest to
you.
If you are interested let me know and will make some small scans and
send them to via email - as positive images.
Kindest Regards,
Tom Yanul,
Chicago
Of course I was curious. I answered affirmatively and Mr.
Yanul sent me the scans.
Here is one of them. Half of a stereoscopic
negative, to be precise. A little disappointing for me, I was hoping to find in
Rosati’s studio some of the rugs visible in his paintings.
The rug on the
floor could be a Gandja but I cannot make much of the ones on the
wall.
In the meantime Mr. Yanul realized "that Rosati is actually
making a watercolor of the man who is taking the photo, namely Alfredo Saldivar.
I have about a dozen or more of the family Saldivar group in front of the Sphinx
and obviously from what you see Rosati working on is this man sitting on a camel
in front of the Sphinx and Great Pyramid ! It’s amazing to me, but as I say I
had not gone through these particular negs of the artist (he visits studios of
two other Rome artists and takes photos also). The date of the above negs is
December 24, 1912."
Then Mr. Yanul sent me another photo
with the
following comment:
Filiberto, I went into my other stereos and found
the Egypt Sphinx negs, and here is one that is the main man, the person whose
picture is being painted by Rosati.
It would appear that Rosati is simply
making a colored version of this photo. It’s very close - or there could have
been a similar shot that I don't have. You may have noticed that on the easel,
to the left, kind of under other papers there is the head of the Sphinx showing,
which might be this photo enlarged, from which Rosati is making the
painting.
Interesting… and now it’s in color, via the knowledge and/or
imagination of Rosati.
Here is a detail of the photo. I tried to
make it more readable:
Do you see the photo
with the Sphinx’s head to the left of the painting?
So… Mr. Saldivar had
a photo of himself taken in front of the Great Pyramid.
When in Rome he gave
the photo to Rosati and asked for a painting from it.
When Rosati was working
on the painting, he (probably) took a photo of the artist… Now the circle is
closed.
We
already knew that a lot of painters used photos but I find this casual little
discovery quite amusing, isn’t it? I wanted to share it with you.
Many
thanks to Mr. Tom Yanul for his kindness and collaboration.
Regards,
dear Filiberto Boncompagni
thank you very much. such 'solid'
information is much valued.
sincerely
richard farber
Hi Filiberto,
that salon of yours was a real winter warmer. I enjoyed
it tremendously. By the way, I have made an excursion recently, visiting the
exhibition "Faces of the Orient - 10.000 Years of Art and Culture from Jordan."
Very interesting, and you are right in the middle of
it.
Yours,
Horst
Richard, Horst,
I'm glad of your interest
Regards,
Filiberto
I was cleaning-up my old e-mail and re-reading my exchange with Mr. Yanul I
realized that I forgot something:
the above photos are copyright of
Tom Yanul.
Well, better late than
never.
Regards,
Filiberto
Dear Turkoteers,
Nr. Yanul found another photo showing the two rugs on
the walls of Rosati’s studio with more detail:
He also reminded me
that at the time the films were not sensitive in equal measure to the colors:
they tended to be over-sensitive to blues and violets but almost blind to reds
and greens - thus showing the firsts lighter and the seconds much darker than in
reality.
Now to the rugs: the one on the right seems an Anatolian kilim
with parmakli motifs, right?
What about the one on the left? It seems
an embroidery to me, or a printed fabric (Indian? Persian?),with botehs in the
outer border. What do you think?
Thanks again to Mr.
Yanul,
Filiberto
ma'a salaam ya filiberto
i would agree with you that the piece on the
left could be a persian embroidery of the type usually called kirman or kerman .
. . it could also be a kalamkar . . . very hard to tell from the image on the
screen but surely not a knotted or flat weave
piece
sincerely
richard farber
Hi Richard,
Yes, a Kerman embroidery!
You posted one in your last
salon...
Regards,
Filiberto