The Ed and Mike Show, Part 2
Dear folks –
This is Part 2 of a Textile Museum rug morning
given by Ed Zimmerman and Michael Seidman on December 7, 2002. There is a Part
1 hereabout with which it would be best to start. Ed and Mike showed pieces
from their own collections.
The next piece was also described as an
Afshar bag face.
It has a nice white ground field
and interesting designs everywhere in it.
The piece below is a fragment
of Balouch kilim.
It reminded me of a larger piece
that Joe Fell showed recently and that we will see in a salon next month. Lots
of typical Balouch designs done at a high level of quality.
The piece
below was described as a Qashqai bag face.
It has a wide and lighter than usual palette.
The
piece below is another Afshar bag face, this one with stars.
This was a complete bag and the back was very striking
too.
The piece below was the first of several
Shahsevan pieces.
It is both very colorful and very precisely and nicely
composed.
The next piece, also Shahsevan, was a complete
“mafrash,” of the cargo bag type.
The last Shahsevan piece was another mafrash panel of
seemingly simple but actually quite sophisticated design. Its graphic power
illustrates what can be done with a fairly restricted color
palette.
I especially like how the weaver used scale to
make the field and the major and minor borders “work” effectively
with one another without competition.
The colorful rug below was
described as Kurdish.
It one of the group of Kurdish rugs
that Michael Wendorf discussed recently here in salon 88. Here is that
link:
http://www.turkotek.com/salon_00088/salon.html
The
piece below is a very similar Kurdish bag face.
The unusual piece below was described as Anatolian Kurd.
This is an old rug, but there is something quite modern-seeming to me about its
design. Very abstracted.
Here is a slightly closer
look.
Michael said the long rug below was likely
Varamin.
I said that there were some long rugs with
these Turkmen-like gul forms that are called Kuchon Kurd. Michael said that
color palette suggested Varamin to him.
The piece below is also Veramin,
this time a bag face that also has gul-like design in its field.
Next, we moved to a Tekke main carpet of Ed’s. Ed
called it one of his “better” Tekke main carpet pieces, saying that
he didn’t have one of the “best” ones.
Ed called attention to the roundness of the major guls,
the spaciousness of the design and the relative simplicity of the maid border.
Notice that of the cartouches in the border with four
stars, there are none in this rug, as is usual with other Tekkes, that have a
white ground.
The last rug that Michael and Ed showed in their
presentation was this Yomut main carpet of Ed’s.
The overall picture above doesn’t let you see the
color in this piece.
And the pile ends on this piece are
reminiscent of those on the ends of the TM’s great “chuval gul”
main carpet.
Those are curvilinear. These are old but more
recent and the design has been done in a rectilinear mode.
Our thanks to
Michael for an attribution listing and to both him and Ed for permission to put
their nice rug morning up on Turkotek.
I think you’ll agree that
the “new collectors” in the audience got a very good picture of what
experienced collectors like and have.
Regards,
R. John Howe
E. Anatolian Kurd
Greetings John and all:
Thanks. Great photo essay. I do not
recall seeing so many excellent Afshar pieces in one place in a long
time.
One piece that caught my eye is the Anatolian Kurd rug seen in
full and a detail shot. This type of rug was first published by Heinrich Jacoby
in his "Eine Sammlung Orientalischer Teppiche" in 1923. These pieces often have
dark, deeply saturated colors with red-brown or violet wefts and two ply warps
that are ivory and tan or light brown. Bruggemann and Bohmer firmly attribute
these rugs, which all seem to come from the same place based on color and
weave/structure, to eastern Anatolia. The gul like forms recall some Turkmen
guls (Ballard Yomut main carpet, for example) and seem to appear no where else
in Anatolia. Also consider the grid and dividing lines normally present, a
relationship to Tekke main carpets? However, Bruggemann and Bohmer suggest a
relationship to some Fustat fragments. See Rugs of Anatolia plate 88 page
284-5. And interesting and intriguing group of rugs.
Thanks again John,
great job. Best, Michael
P.S. I agree with Michael Seidman about the
Varamin attribution of the long rug.
Dear folks -
Michael Wendorf points out this Anatolian Kurd piece
in his post above.
I did not, during this Rug Morning,
remember seeing one previously, but I had, since one is included in the
"Mideast Meets Midwest" catalog (Plate 48) done for ACOR II, in
1994.
Then last Saturday at The Textile Museum, Harold Keshishian did a
program on Turkish rugs with 15 older pieces. He had two rugs with this same
design and color palette.
Regards,
R. John Howe