A pair of bag faces, twins or relatives?!

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A pair of bag faces, twins or relatives?!

    Not so long ago I acquired these 2 bag faces. I made the decision to buy them on the basis of photographs and from these I assumed that they were a pair. They were both filthy so I gave them a good clean and it was only then that I started to notice more and more differences.
    (Images A and B)

    Let’s call the one on the left bag face 1.
    (Images C, D, E and F)
    Thew one on the right bag face 2.
    (Images G, H, I and J)
    I have no idea where they originate from but think they might be Kurdish? I think that they are old and that most of the dyes the are natural although some of the dark brown on bag face 1 has corrosion, so possibly early synthetic?

    Quite clearly, the colour scheme and motifs have a common origin and only when looking at the detail do the differences become apparent. When viewing the backs they look quite different, bag face 1 having seemingly tighter drawing and wefts are different colour.
    Both have symmetrical knots, single and double wefted, but bag face 1 uses brown yarn, bag face 2 pink/red yarn (I think that they are both all wool). Handle is similar but bag face 1 slightly less floppy and possibly thicker pile.
    I don’t think that they are twins but rather relatives. What do others think? If they are relatives which one is older or are they about the same age? I was going to keep 1 of them and sell the other but think I’ll hang on to them both as they might show the evolution of a common design.


  • #2
    Here are Carl's photos. I think they're in the order that he mentions them above.

    Steve Price

    PS - Carl - Please edit your User Name; I assume that your name is Carl Gray. Thanks.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi Carl,

      Your bag faces are of a somewhat common Kurdish type presumed to have been woven in Iranian Kurdistan. From what I can tell, they both appear to be double-wefted (i.e., have two or more weft shots between rows of knots). And while this type generally has little or no use of offset knotting, it is nonetheless sometimes attributed to Jaf Kurds. I'm skeptical that we should be that specific as to the Kurdish group who wove them.

      Here are a couple that I have:

      Click image for larger version

Name:	Alt-Jaf1.jpg
Views:	190
Size:	215.7 KB
ID:	710

      Click image for larger version

Name:	alt-Jaf.jpg
Views:	192
Size:	216.2 KB
ID:	711

      and one from Michael Rothberg's beautiful recent volume, Nomadic Visions: Tribal Weavings from Persia and the Caucasus:

      Click image for larger version

Name:	Rothberg.jpg
Views:	192
Size:	170.9 KB
ID:	712

      Joel Greifinger

      Comment


      • #4
        I enjoyed looking at these! I just acquired this one. I am wondering if it might be Kurdish as well? The back looks so very similar to the one
        Carl Gray
        Registered
        Carl Gray posted. I also just ordered this book you mentioned. thanks!
        Attached Files
        kellyhousholder
        Junior Member
        Last edited by kellyhousholder; 09-21-2022, 09:04 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Thank you Steve, Joel and Kelly,
          Joel, the first example of yours does share many of the same motifs, borders and layout... much cleaner though. It is useful to have a comparison example. Any idea of the age? Are natural dyes used?
          Is there any way to guesstimate the age of mine? Does the weft colour difference, red/pink and brown, of mine give any clues? Is one likely to be older than the other? Am I correct in assuming that natural dyes have been used?
          Steve, I am logged on right now and none of the options allow me to change user name, and you are correct it is Carl Gray. I suspect that this might be an admin function?
          Best, Carl

          Comment


          • #6
            Hi Carl

            I think your bags have natural dyes. They look right to me, and the corrosive black wasn't used after about 1875 except by the Baluch groups.

            I changed your user name to Carl Gray. It should work when you log in again.

            Steve

            Comment


            • #7
              Carl,

              As I'm sure you're aware, both of your bag faces are missing borders and possibly other design elements. Here are some others with the complete design:

              Click image for larger version

Name:	Memarian alt Jaf.jpg
Views:	168
Size:	73.3 KB
ID:	732

              Click image for larger version

Name:	Mete alt Jaf double.jpg
Views:	166
Size:	123.4 KB
ID:	733

              Click image for larger version

Name:	Wayne3 alt Jaf.jpg
Views:	170
Size:	135.0 KB
ID:	734

              Joel

              Comment


              • #8
                Kelly,

                I would guess that your bag face is also Kurdish from NW Persia. While the octagonal motifs in the border are used by other groups as well, they are a very frequent feature of Kurdish weaving from the region. A Jaf example:

                Click image for larger version  Name:	Jaf w-2 diamonds.jpg Views:	0 Size:	83.7 KB ID:	736

                The most striking thing for me in your bag face is that the field elements hark back to early Kurdish rugs. The central motif and flowers are reminiscent of the motifs on this Sauj Bulagh rug that has been attributed to the 17th century:

                Click image for larger version  Name:	Old SB.jpg Views:	0 Size:	270.6 KB ID:	737

                I don't recall seeing that flower rendition on a bag before.

                Joel





                Comment


                • #9
                  Thank you Steve and Joel,
                  the second example posted by Joel, mirrored back and front, is very close to the ones I have, and there are some differences, notably the main motifs differ in height. Dyes are more subtle than the other examples, again like mine.
                  Do you know what the weft colour is?
                  What age would you say it is?
                  Thanks to your I can now label them up with a better description than before.
                  I'll try to upload an image of another Kurdish bag I got at the same time now.
                  Best, Carl

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hi Carl

                    I'd guess the age as late 19th century. The corroded black virtually eliminates anything much more recent. There are lots of Caucasian rugs that are 100 years more recent that have had the blacks shaved, but it's easy to tell the difference between shaved and corroded by just rubbing a finger over it. Corroded blacks will virtually disintegrate when you rub them.

                    Steve

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Carl_8.jpg
Views:	145
Size:	186.4 KB
ID:	753
                      This is another image that Carl sent me.

                      Thanks, Carl.

                      Steve Price

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Hi Carl,

                        That bag face fragment has lovely colors. It too is a classic Kurdish khorjin design. The figures that look vaguely like two-headed dragons are derived from the saz leaves in the herati pattern. Here is one that has an elem:

                        Click image for larger version  Name:	Kurd bf box border w-star elem copy.jpg Views:	0 Size:	306.4 KB ID:	755

                        And still another with those strangely zoomorphic leaves:

                        Click image for larger version  Name:	Kurd herati Skinner.jpg Views:	0 Size:	274.6 KB ID:	756

                        Joel

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Thank you Joel,
                          I can label that one up as well!.
                          It is very psychedelic isn't it!
                          No apparent corrosion on the dark brown. Does that tell me anything about approximate age?
                          KInd regards, Carl

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC05678e.jpg Views:	0 Size:	204.4 KB ID:	762

                            Here is the one in my collection. It has been collecting dust on the seat of my recliner for 25 years or so. Most likely some of the colors are synthetic. I suspect a pre WWII era production. The panels are of different sizes than the typical examples with a larger central band and smaller end bands. The back shows some of the typical Kurdish brocade and complementary weft work:

                            Click image for larger version  Name:	kurd back.jpg Views:	0 Size:	177.4 KB ID:	763

                            Comment

                            Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                            Auto-Saved
                            x
                            Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                            x
                            or Allowed Filetypes: jpg, jpeg, png, gif
                            x

                            Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image below.

                            Registration Image Refresh Image
                            Working...
                            X