Rough in the diamonds

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Chuck, I tried "edit" to add the picture again, no luck. Here it is again, hopefully:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	kurdbigbAG.jpg Views:	0 Size:	238.4 KB ID:	322

    This format is definitely Kurdish. I have seen a few like this, said to be bags - quite large, though.
    Dinie, what is your address? I'm coming over to steal that Qashqa'i chanteh.

    Patrick Weiler

    Comment


    • #17
      Click image for larger version

Name:	cw-af1.jpg
Views:	134
Size:	259.1 KB
ID:	336

      Hi Chuck,

      As Pat points out, those motifs appear regularly in the large, two-panel Kurdish chuvals:

      Click image for larger version

Name:	Craycraft two-panel copy.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	151.1 KB
ID:	337

      Here's the full version of the partial motifs in the corners:

      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0093 copy.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	153.6 KB
ID:	340

      And, a looser rendition of the central motif:

      Click image for larger version

Name:	Kurd 2-panel w-Khamseh border.jpg
Views:	124
Size:	153.3 KB
ID:	338
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • #18
        Pat,

        Another rich source of latchhook diamonds are Kurdish pieces from the Maltya-Gaziantep region of Anatolia. This is a well-known type:

        Click image for larger version

Name:	Gazienantep1fixed copy.jpg
Views:	125
Size:	255.9 KB
ID:	345

        And on these yastiks:

        Click image for larger version

Name:	Malatya-Gaziantep yastik 4 copy.jpg
Views:	118
Size:	117.0 KB
ID:	346 Click image for larger version

Name:	Malatya yastik copy 2.jpg
Views:	120
Size:	315.9 KB
ID:	347 Click image for larger version

Name:	Malatya-Gaziantep yastik 2 copy.jpg
Views:	119
Size:	293.4 KB
ID:	348 Click image for larger version

Name:	Malatya-Gaziantep yastik copy.jpg
Views:	120
Size:	259.5 KB
ID:	349

        Joel

        Comment


        • #19
          Chuck, I will attempt to post my Kurdish bag again, here: Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9889_edited.jpg
Views:	124
Size:	227.7 KB
ID:	354

          Comment


          • #20
            I thought I replied to Dinie's post, but see nothing, so I will try again! Dinie, your Qashqai chanteh looks like a Luri in appearance - except for the "Qashqa'i Frieze" end panels in complementary weft - and the silk wefts. Perhaps it was made by a Luri woman in a Qashqa'i confederation group. Luri families were part of both the Qashqa'i and Khamseh confederations.
            Patrick Weiler

            Comment


            • #21
              Click image for larger version  Name:	image_121.jpg Views:	5 Size:	257.5 KB ID:	358

              All of a sudden I'm seeing latch-hook-bird-head-diamonds everywhere, but I think this Shekarlu on my wall wins the prize in my collection for the most examples.
              PaulSmith
              Senior Member
              Last edited by PaulSmith; 05-27-2022, 08:39 PM.

              Comment


              • #22
                Another yastik, this one from Central Anatolia, probably Mucur, and a favorite

                Click image for larger version

Name:	Mucur yastik.jpg
Views:	101
Size:	310.6 KB
ID:	372

                Joel

                Comment


                • #23
                  Hi Pat, Joel, et al.,

                  Some very interesting examples, to be sure. And I have found more from eastern Anatolia and NW Persia - Tabriz, etc.

                  And now, an Afshar:



                  And a Qashqai:


                  And a Khamseh:


                  I originally landed at Afshar because of the palette, which to me is very far from typical Kurdish work.

                  And I have to say that, after doing the book search, I am now settling on Khamseh, because of the vertical bars connecting the red diamonds containing the smaller florettes, which is a extremely common feature of Khamseh work.



                  Regards
                  Chuck

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Paul,
                    You may know that even Opie has mentioned that the Shekarlu design may have Khamseh roots, though nearly all rug folks simply call them all Qashqa'i. Looking at features like the darker warps on most of these, and the style of motifs in the field, lend credence to that idea. You may have escalated the competition with the number of latchhook motifs!

                    Joel, some of those yastiks are really great! That last Mujur piece shows conclusively that the obvious origin of the design was Luri and the hundreds of years old Anatolian versions are simple copies, right?
                    Here is another Luri version. I did not include it in my original post because it has a "swallowtail diamond" design on the other side, which was facing up when I was rifling through my bagface stash.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	luribagface.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	280.3 KB
ID:	376

                    I hate it when that happens.
                    Patrick Weiler

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Hi Patrick,

                      What are the Luri elements you see in my chanteh? The irregular drawing and colour distribution?

                      As to the stealing of the chanteh, it suffers badly from claustrophobia. Even thinking of your bunker makes it blanch, almost fade, so I will have to keep my address hidden from you. Soooo sorry.

                      Dinie

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Dinie Gootjes View Post

                        I am still finding out the the finer points of the new software, but I do like the possibility to directly upload pictures from the computer. A long standing wish fulfilled!


                        Dinie
                        Hi Dinie

                        The old software had that capability, too, but it was disabled. My concern was that it carried too much risk of mischief. Malware can hide in a JPG, not to mention offensive photos. Filiberto, Joel and Chuck are willing to take on those risks. I wasn't.

                        Steve Price

                        Comment

                        Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                        Auto-Saved
                        x
                        Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                        x
                        or Allowed Filetypes: jpg, jpeg, png, gif
                        x

                        Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image below.

                        Registration Image Refresh Image
                        Working...
                        X