A funny bagface

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A funny bagface

    I recently bought the small bagface below on an Ebay auction, where it was advertised as "Antique Qashqai small Bagface ... Size: 43 x 39 cm. Will have natural as well as synth. dyes." Somewhat strangely its rug type and regional design was stated as "Kurdish".

    Is its origin Qashgai or Kurdish or something else? What is its approximate age? And what about the rather strange-looking motif?


    Click image for larger version

Name:	s-l1600 (3).jpg
Views:	153
Size:	250.1 KB
ID:	2081 Click image for larger version

Name:	s-l1600 (4).jpg
Views:	145
Size:	277.7 KB
ID:	2082

  • #2
    Hi Erik,

    The style of the closure tabs, the weft-substitution rosettes above and below them and the apparently cotton warps all suggest that it is Afshar, probably from the mid-twentieth century.

    Joel Greifinger

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you, Joel, for helping me out on this! Any ideas about the motif?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Erik Persson View Post
        Thank you, Joel, for helping me out on this! Any ideas about the motif?
        Hi Erik

        I agree with Joel (that it's most likely Afshar, mid-20th century). If the motif had any meaning in the distant past, a weaver in 1950 was unlikely to know or care what it is.

        Steve Price

        Comment


        • #5
          Thank you, Steve, for confirming Joel's opinion! The motif is mysterious: To me it appears as it could be a highly stylized bowl of flowers, but I guess there is some more sophisticated explanation.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hi Erik

            It's very unlikely to be anything more mysterious than the pattern on the shirt I'm wearing.

            Steve Price

            Comment


            • #7
              Your shirt must be quite colourful, Steve!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Steve Price View Post

                Hi Erik

                I agree with Joel (that it's most likely Afshar, mid-20th century). If the motif had any meaning in the distant past, a weaver in 1950 was unlikely to know or care what it is.

                Steve Price
                Steve, I respectfully disagree with you one this one. 1950 in this area of the world may as well have been 1850. Not a lot had changed in this time period. Significant change didn’t really start until the ‘70’s in villages….assuming it was made in a village. Village life in 1950 would have little to no electricity, running water or plumbing for example. More importantly, there would have been elders around that would have known the knowledge and meaning of the old ways passed on from their elders.

                Joe Lawrence

                Comment


                • #9
                  Hi

                  I am also inclined to agree with Joel. The rosettes in the closure strip could also indicate a Veramin origin. The motif is a very simplified version of a common Afshar motif. But looking at the back, the color palette is very far from any Afshar work I've seen. The pale pinks, greens, and blues look more like they're from Turkey or Pakistan, and all are very faded on the front. I agree this looks like mid-20th century work.

                  Regards
                  Chuck

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Thank you, Chuck, for your expert comments! I have browsed through my books on tribal rugs and bags and googled a little at that, but I am unable to find anything very similar to this one. Peter Stone in his definitive guide to the design of tribal and village rugs mentions various Afshar vase motifs, but I cannot see any similarity between his illustrations and what I see in this rug. You do not happen to have at hand a picture of a rug with the motif you think this one is a simplified version of? If the colours seem more like those used in Turkey and Pakistan, what would that mean? Is the bagface after all not Iranian Afshar or Veramin?
                    Erik Persson
                    Senior Member
                    Last edited by Erik Persson; 03-12-2024, 01:51 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Erik,

                      Here's one (this is on the market so no comments beyond the motif itself) :


                      Regards
                      Chuck

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Yes, now I see what you mean - the strange "funniness" of the bagface is the result of the over-simplification of the vase (Zil-i-Sultan) motif! What I have is, as it were, a silly Sultan...
                        Erik Persson
                        Senior Member
                        Last edited by Erik Persson; 03-12-2024, 05:12 PM.

                        Comment

                        Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                        Auto-Saved
                        x
                        Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                        x
                        or Allowed Filetypes: jpg, jpeg, png, gif
                        x

                        Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image below.

                        Registration Image Refresh Image
                        Working...
                        X