Welcome to TurkoTek's Discussion Forums

Archived Salons and Selected Discussions can be accessed by clicking on those words, or you can return to the Turkotek Home Page. Our forums are easy to use, and you are welcome to read and post messages without registering. However, registration will enable a number of features that make the software more flexible and convenient for you, and you need not provide any information except your name (which is required even if you post without being registered). Please use your full name. We do not permit posting anonymously or under a pseudonym, ad hominem remarks, commercial promotion, comments bearing on the value of any item currently on the market or on the reputation of any seller. Attribution of paintings - Turkotek Discussion Forums


Go Back   Turkotek Discussion Forums > Rugs and Old Masters: An Essay Series > 4. Rugs in 16th and 17th C. English Paintings
Reload this Page Attribution of paintings
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old April 8th, 2016, 10:48 PM   #1
pierberio
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1
Default Attribution of paintings
IMHO, The portrait n. 133 Margareth Douglas could be by Daniel Mytens.
The portrait n. 135 Lady Arabella Stuart coul be by Marcus Gheeraerts.
Regarding Mary, queen of Scots, The portrait shown is, yes, by anonimous
but is in National gallery of Scotland.
The painting in NPG is after Nicholas Hilliard and is different an only half figure
pierberio is offline   Reply With Quote
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:04 AM.

Contact Us - Turkotek - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.